• The Tom Walsingham Mysteries
  • Clara who?
  • Stories
  • Contact

Scribblings

~ Clara Giuliani, storyteller

Scribblings

Category Archives: History

Emma, Kit and I

16 Saturday Nov 2013

Posted by la Clarina in History, Stories, Theatre

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

#StoryMOOC, christopher marlowe, Questia Online Library, Richard Horne

I told you about the MOOC on the future of storytelling, didn’t I?

Last week’s creative challenge was to make up a character, and give him or her an online life. So Emma was born, and she has a blog, where she babbles about her obsession for Christopher Marlowe…

English: American poet and playwright Josephin...Amongst other things, she’s posted about Jospehine Preston Peabody’s play – the one I mentioned here. So I thought I’d make use of her post to explain things a little.

I first came across this play on Questia, of all places, and I love it: it is a quaint affair in blank verse, with perhaps the most likeable fictional Kit I ever found. JPP is unashamedly in love with her hero – and yet, she doesn’t make him too annoyingly perfect. All right, it could be argued that he is a rather idealized Marlowe, but bear in mind the play was written long before most of what are now key Marlowe documents were dug out. So Aunt Josephine writes a fiery, moody, aspiring young man, a victim of his own rashness and far-flung notions, as much as of jealousy, meanness and intrigue – and leaves out most of what is unpleasant and/or controversial.

But, for once, never mind historical accuracy: her Kit is likeable, and as he very much dominates the scene, this is more than enough for me.

I’ll say it again: I love this play. It is the sort of thing you’d stage with old-fashioned costumes, painted scenery, honey-thick
toy-theatre-in-a-victorian-parlor1lighting… There is a game I like to play when I surf the Net, singling out bits of scenery, props and stuff I’d use for my imaginary production – and who knows, maybe some day I’ll make myself a JPP toy-theatre.

Besides, last night, while looking up a picture for Emma’s post I found two Marlowe-themed plays I’d never heard about. Nineteenth Centrury stuff, in resounding blank verse, from what I gather: Richard Horne‘s The Death of Marlowe, and James Dryden Hosken’s Christopher Marlowe.

So, isn’t it wonderful? Emma is three days old, has a few friends, writes posts I can use as inspiration, and finds long-forgotten plays I’ll like to read… I am so glad I made her up!

Related articles
  • Festival brings Christopher Marlowe back to centre stage (thetimes.co.uk)
  • Christopher Marlowe (uofuhistoryoftheatre.wordpress.com)

1066 and the Perception of Violence

12 Saturday Oct 2013

Posted by la Clarina in Books, History

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

book reviews, Books, historical novel, History, james aitcheson, norman conquest

AitchesonIn less than two weeks, James Aitcheson’s new historical novel, Knights of the Hawk will be out.

It is the third book in a trilogy, and I loved the first two volumes* – so I’ll most certainly buy and read the third instalment of the story of Tancred a Dinant.

They make for a great read, these novels: good, solid, exciting adventures in a post-Hastings England, from a Norman point of view, with a well-meaning hero, talented in the art of finding trouble.

Tancred is a half-Breton who serves under Norman colours, and does not know too well what to call himself. He very much means to be a good knight, a good vassal, a good Christian, and is brave, honourable and smart – but also far too ambitious, outspoken and headstrong for his own good…

Aitcheson chronicles his struggles and rise, and does it well. He writes with good rhythm, engaging characters, excellent dialogue, and his recreation of Medieval England rings rich and true without overwhelming the reader with needless detail. What is even more, his people think, feel, fight, believe and talk like XI Century people.

So yes, I really like these books – and this is why I was surprised by a few of the reviews on Amazon. Now, let me explain: I did this some time ago, when the second volume, The Splintered Kingdom was just out in the UK, and the reviews were just a handful, all of them good to enthusiastic, but…

But most reviewers remarked on the violence and brutality of the fight scenes. One reader described them as “high-octane stuff”.

And I was perplexed, because I’d found nothing especially gruesome in TSK – and I’m a wimp. I have trouble reading very graphic descriptions of violence, tire easily of too much grit and gore, and have been known to abandon books out of sheer revulsion.

And yet Aitcheson, while never glossing over the unpleasant realities of his time-period, does not strike me as a “brutal” writer. Bayeux_Tapestry_scene19_Dinan

So I wonder. Have I developed a higher threshold for written violence over the years? It seems unlikely, and in truth I think it is something else.

I think it is that Tancred, hero and narrator, never shows a qualm when it comes to battle, killing and bloodshed. He has been fighting his whole life, with unabashed enthusiasm and a certainty of being on the right side. He enjoys it – and yes, it is a hard and chancy life, foes are in dead earnest, friends die, defeat and ruin are never far away, and yet to Tancred few things equal the battle-joy.

Not once in four hundred pages does he go through one of those crises of disgust and remorse. Fighting is his job – in a very unashamed and medieval way: he is good at it, he has developed a little of what he doesn’t know to be adrenaline addiction, and almost pities those who ignore the way of the sword and its dangerous joys.

Very politically uncorrect, very historically correct.

So I wonder: is this what creeps out reviewers? Not so much violence itself, as an attitude to violence? This brazen taste for battle – that works its high-octane charm on us, civilized people, even while we feel we ought to disapprove it?

_____________________________________

* Actually, the second one I also reviewed for the HNR.

Related articles
  • Review: Hereward: End Of Days (speesh.wordpress.com)
  • Review: Knights of the Hawk (speesh.wordpress.com)

The Lost (and mostly Silent) Marlowe

03 Thursday Oct 2013

Posted by la Clarina in History, Stories, Theatre

≈ 9 Comments

Tags

bess meredyth, christopher marlowe, douglas fairbanks, josephine preston peabody, silver scenes, the great imaginary film blogathon

GreatImaginaryFilm3_zps8b61fde6One month in, and posting off schedule already…

Ah, but The Great Imaginary Film Blogathon hosted by the wonderful Silver Scenes was just too good to pass…

I love old movies (with a special soft spot for silents), and I love to play What If… So, let us play, shall we?

***

Screenwriter (and actress) Bess Meredyth had had her sights on Josephine Preston Peabody’s play “Marlowe” for some years, before United Artists summoned up some interest in the project. Amongst other things, the 1914 play was very stage-y, and it was felt that, once its remarkable verse dialogue was stripped down to the form of silent movie title cards, it might lack interest…

Bess Meredyth did not think so. She wrote the adaptation – straying from Preston Peabody to add a duel scene, expand one of the female roles, and play down the little matter of Marlowe’s atheism – and kept knocking at doors, until the project got the green light in late 1928.

Douglas The Younger

Douglas The Younger

John Gilbert was the first choice for the lead, but when he declined, Douglas Fairbanks stepped in to claim the role for his young, and comparatively untried, son. This meant taking a chance or two, because though a sort of UA crown prince, young Doug was really young for to play Kit Marlowe, and just stepping out of supporting roles. Still, he seemed to be a promising star on the making, so someone must have thought: why not?

And so, “Marlowe” it was – with director Allan Dwan* (of Robin Hood fame) at the helm.

Kit and Alison at the Bee-Hive

Kit and Alison at the Bee-Hive

The plot is simple enough: in 1589 London, star playwright Kit Marlowe is enjoying the triumph of his latest play, Doctor Faustus. While making merry with fellow-poet Robin Greene (Harry Gording) at the Bee-Hive Inn, he meets sweet Alison Barnby (Marguerite La Motte), fresh from Canterbury, and ready to be swept off her feet by the charming poet. Unfortunately, Alison comes equipped with not one, but two suitors: amiable Kentish man Gabriel (John Garrick), and sullen Londoner Richard Bame (Basil Rathbone), and neither is best pleased. In fact, they might spare themselves some anguish: for one thing, Kit is busy with an unnamed Court lady (Dorothy Revier), and then, as he takes pains to explain to Gabriel, he loves Alison “in the way one loves the evening star” – from afar, and only in the spirit of the purest admiration. If Gabriel is appeased, the bitter Bame is not. When in the end Alison gently rebuffs him, it is for kind-hearted Gabriel’s sake, but Bame lays the blame at Marlowe’s door – and, after being spared by the poet in a clumsy attempt at a duel, vows dire revenge.

Basil Rathbone as the villain Richard Bame

Basil Rathbone as the misnamed villain Richard Bame

Fast forward three years – and we learn that Kit hasn’t fared too well for himself. Too outspoken in his dangerous opinions (though just what these opinions are is never explained), he has lost the favour of the Court and leading companies – not to mention Her Ladyship. Now she is bent on teaching him a lesson, and has found the perfect tool: Richard Bame who, it seems, has spent the last three years eavesdropping on Marlowe, and keeping a list of every pernicious and rash notion he voiced – the sort of words that bring one to the scaffold.

On learning that sweet Alison is married to Gabriel, Bame is distraught that he “did it all for nothing”, but not enough to relent towards Marlowe – whom he still blames. It hardly helps matters that an embittered Kit sets out for Canterbury, both to escape his London enemies, and to see Alison again.

Off to Canterbury, on a fine summer night. Gabriel goes out to meet Bame, come to warn him against Marlowe – who, of course, arrives the moment Alison is alone. The two share a nice talk, and Kit, who had come to steal a kiss, goes away without it, but much moved by the girl’s understanding and compassion.

And back to Deptford he slogs, all brooding and maudlin and despairing of himself – again followed by the half-crazed Bame. Between the two of them, they manage to pick a quarrel with a perfect stranger who, in the ensuing brawl, stabs Kit. Gabriel arrives just in time to hear his dying words – the name of Alison, his evening star.

Well, it was an invocation to God in the play but, with the suppression of Kit’s atheism, it would have made very little sense in the film…

Dorothy Revier as Her Ladyship

Dorothy Revier as Her Ladyship

Still, Meredyth manages to preserve the intensity of Kit Marlowe’s character, and young Fairbanks makes a very decent job of it, with an engaging mix of boyishness, fiery arrogance, quirky humour and gloom. Marguerite La Motte, as the young and innocent Alison, certainly looks the part – although she plays it a tad on the dizzy side. Dorothy Revier, gorgeously attired as Her Ladyship, darts sultry look after sultry look, and John Garrick is suitably earnest as the good-hearted young lover. My favourites, though, have to be Basil Rathbone’s sullen and resentful Bame (actually Baines – he of the famous “Note”), slowly descending into near-madness, and Harry Gording’s lusty and British-accented Robin Greene.

Yes: British-accented. “Marlowe” was originally conceived as a part-talkie, one of those hybrid things that appeared in the 1927-1929 interregnum between silents and talkies. Through various vicissitudes, only one sound sequence survives, and it is of Gording merrily singing to Hugo Riesenfeld’s music, and the laughter of his fellow poets.

Interestingly for history buffs like myself, Preston Peabody’s play predates Leslie Hotson’s discovery of the papers for the inquest on Marlowe’s death, and so follows the then accepted tradition of a rivalry over a woman, with the more misspelled than mysterious Francis Archer as the murderer. By 1929, Hotson’s work was widely known, so Meredyth changed the name to that of the real murderer, Ingram Frizer.

Yes, well...

Preston Peabody would be so proud…

Is this film a masterpiece? Very likely not. The action is a bit static, the sets look almost like toy-theatre scenery, and the whole thing feels more than a bit like filmed theatre… And yet, because of this, and of the quaint blank-verse title cards, the film acquires a certain dream-like quality that is endearing, and sets off this highly idealized portrait of Kit Marlowe as a sort of silent, black-and white Elizabethan fantasy.

***

Now, wouldn’t it be nice if they had really made it?

_______________________________________

* Dwan would go on to direct part of the same crew (although with a different Fairbanks) in The Iron Mask later that year.

Shakespeare – The Hidden Truth

07 Saturday Sep 2013

Posted by la Clarina in History

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

authorship question, first folio, francis bacon, petter amundsen, shakespeare

FirstFolioSo, Petter Amundsen is this Norwegian organist, freemason,”dabbler in occultism”, and steganographer, who claims he found evidence that Sir Francis Bacon wrote Shakespeare’s plays – and found it in the First Folio.

He’s not the first. Delia Bacon started that back in 1857, based on a combination of “discovered” cipher and quasi-mystical hunches*, and hordes of cryptographers have pursued her trail ever since, “uncovering” all sorts of hidden messages in Shakespeare’s works.

Usually, the Bacon side of the Authorship Question lithobrakes against little facts such as the huge difference between Bacon’s own style and Shakespeare’s, or Bacon’s life – a very busy one without throwing in some forty plays…

Amundsen sidesteps these objections by saying that why, yes – but then, who wrote Shakespeare is not the real question…

And this, you’ll agree, is… well, unusual. Then again, Amundsen is not so much an anti-Stratfordian as a conspiracy theorist. He claims that, whoever wrote Shakespeare, did so to forward the Rosicrucian goal of a “universal reform of Mankind”. And who was the leader of the very, very secret order of the Rosy Cross – so very secret that its very existence is none too sure? But Francis Bacon, of course! Anyway, in 1623, whoever was behind the publication of the First Folio (and Bacon just happened to be a master steganographer…) had a number of clues encripted in the printed text – clues leading to the treasure buried on Oak Island, off the coast of Nova Scotia.

What treasure? The lost menorah from the temple of Jerusalem, and Shakespeare’s original manuscripts – preserved in quicksilver.

Shakespeare – The Hidden Truth is a documentary movie telling the tale of Amundsen’s research in company with an English PhD student – and ortodox Stratfordian – who starts ofs as a sceptic and ends up… with doubts. And it is a nice, well made, exciting movie, and it shows a huge quantity of coincidences, but…

But, even discounting my own penchant towards Stratfordian ortodoxy, I can’t help wondering: whoever wrote Shakespeare**, how would he (or they) know what to write so that the right letters and words would combine into the required symbols and clues right on the various pages 53 in the printed version, decades later?

You could say they didn’t, and tweaked the text in 1623. Right – and Amundsen shows some instance of what could look like tampering with page numbers. But I suspect that something more would be needed to achieve all those triangles, constellations and acrostycs… So, how about the Quartos? Does a check against these much earlier editions show enough tweaking in the relevant parts of the First Folio to support Amundsen’s theory?

Still, my biggest doubt remains: why?

According to Amundsen, the original manuscripts are hidden underground, somewhere on Oak Island, preserved in quicksilver for eternity – but why?

Supposing Francis Bacon and his nephew, on behalf of the order of the Rosy Cross, wrote or commissioned Shakespeare’s plays, and hid there the key to the treasure hunt, why go to all this trouble?

Why bother to hide half a world away something whose importance actually resides in the printed version? That is, if the menorah is the prize – and we must assume so, because frankly, Shakespeare’s manuscripts may be the holy grail of literature to us, but  back then, they were just Shakespeare’s manuscripts.

No, really. I doubt anyone, in Elizabethan or Jacobean times, thought of theatre in terms of eternity… Plays were written and consumed fast, publication (and in folio!) was the high mark of success, theatre was hardly what a poet wanted – or expected – to be remembered for.

The notion sounds distinctly anachronistic. But then, it also sounds very much like a locked case containing its own key, doesn’t it?

So yes, I’ll admit coincidence seems to be there in abundant quantity – but then, when you look for coincidence, you usually find it – and all the rest apart, I remain with eyebrows raised, and a lot of questions unanswered.

____________________________________________

* When she crossed the Pond, she famously perplexed her British supporters by all but refusing to see any Shakespearean or Baconian documents. She preferred, she said, to imbibe the atmosphere by taking strolls in what she thought to be the right places…

** And Amundsen seems to allow the chance that Shakespeare wrote his own plays, after all – but at the behest of Sir Francis Bacon.

Newer posts →

Seek and Find

♠ THE TOM WALSINGHAM MYSTERIES

Available on Amazon
Available on Amazon

The Copperfield Review’s first anthology – containing Gentleman in Velvet

Recent Posts

  • For Queen and Country: Tom Walsingham at the HNR
  • A Snare of Deceit is out!
  • A Deadly Complot
  • Merry Christmas!
  • Death in Rheims – Publication day!

Popular Scribblings

  • What Ought to be Truth
  • Bad King John
  • The Organist and the Sailor
  • Had I Not Been Awake
  • A History of Historical Films
  • Tableaux Vivants

Categories

  • Books
  • Eccentricities
  • History
  • Lostintranslation
  • Poetry
  • Scribbling
  • Silents
  • Stories
  • Theatre
  • Things
  • Uncategorized

Enter your email address to get a messenger on horseback... er, an email will reach you by email when a new Scribbling is out.

Join 311 other subscribers

RSS Feeds

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

No Blog’s an Island

Sapere Books

 

IBA

International Bloggers' Association

I tweet on Twitter

And I pin on Pinterest

Senza Errori di Stumpa – my Italian blog

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Scribblings
    • Join 311 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Scribblings
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...